Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/VGQAHNQ24ZMVUJ33MQUSWLWPPOQ5KRLK/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-12/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14313 (+45)
build-tried: 14281 (+43)
build-failed: 27 (-4)
build-n-a: 202 (-94)
build-succeeded: 14052 (+141)
build-official-failed+na: 176 (+140)
build-compare-failed: 411 (+5)
build-compare-succeeded: 13641 (+136)
verify-failed: 347 (-107)
verified-semi-reproducible: 13060 (-74)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13578 (+111)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 509 (+69)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 474 (+30)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
5 were in ring0
40 were in ring1

That makes it 45/3247 => 1.39 %
which is below the overall average of
411/14052 => 2.92 %

509/14052 => 3.62 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible