Hi,

I made some more nice patches this month and even found bugs in meson and qt6.

Here are the autogenerated bits:
last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/RRNQEIVK6CONRY7SMWVZDOAUEBRCC2M6/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-12/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20240131/ today

https://rb.zq1.de/spec/glossar.txt explains the meaning of below values:
total-packages: 15212 (+46)
build-tried: 15189 (+48)
build-failed: 111 (+1)
build-n-a: 230 (-3)
build-succeeded: 14848 (+50)
build-official-failed+na: 95 (+0)
build-compare-failed: 166 (-6)
build-compare-succeeded: 14682 (+56)
verify-failed: 15 (+0)
verified-semi-reproducible: 20 (+1)
verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0)
bit-by-bit-identical: 14082 (+66)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 768 (-15)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 766 (-16)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20240131/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20240131/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
4 were in ring0
32 were in ring1

That makes it 36/3850 => 0.94 %
which is below the overall average of
166/14848 => 1.12 %

768/14848 => 5.17 % of packages are not perfectly bit-reproducible
package notes:
==> ./emacs/.rb.notes <==
= https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-01/msg00464.html

==> ./libjcat/.rb.notes <==
=> SR 1138082
= https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1218715 crypto

==> ./perl-DateTime-TimeZone/.rb.notes <==
FTBFS-j1
osc build --clean --no-preinstallimage --noservice --vm-type=kvm --alternative-project home:bmwiedemann:reproducible -j1 openSUSE_Tumbleweed

==> ./python-rjsmin/.rb.notes <==
=> SR 1137474 var_rjsmin_methods 4-byte diff