Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/VGQAHNQ24ZMVUJ33MQUSWLWPPOQ5KRLK/ Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-12/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14313 (+45) build-tried: 14281 (+43) build-failed: 27 (-4) build-n-a: 202 (-94) build-succeeded: 14052 (+141) build-official-failed+na: 176 (+140) build-compare-failed: 411 (+5) build-compare-succeeded: 13641 (+136) verify-failed: 347 (-107) verified-semi-reproducible: 13060 (-74) bit-by-bit-identical: 13578 (+111) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 509 (+69) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 474 (+30) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220131/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 5 were in ring0 40 were in ring1 That makes it 45/3247 => 1.39 % which is below the overall average of 411/14052 => 2.92 % 509/14052 => 3.62 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible