Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/OEMW25GJTNDVFIHARTBEJLEMWEKUV56F/ Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-10/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14263 (+51) build-tried: 14235 (+54) build-failed: 220 (+172) build-n-a: 287 (-1) build-succeeded: 13728 (-119) build-official-failed+na: 55 (-636) build-compare-failed: 397 (+2) build-compare-succeeded: 13331 (-121) verify-failed: 460 (+5) verified-semi-reproducible: 13210 (+32) bit-by-bit-identical: 13427 (+53) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 466 (-7) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 301 (-172) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 4 were in ring0 35 were in ring1 That makes it 39/3247 => 1.20 % which is below the overall average of 397/13728 => 2.89 % 466/13728 => 3.39 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible