Hi,

this month, I had to spend more time outside of reproducible builds
but I still managed to make a few nice patches and bug-reports.

We had 2 toolchain issues affecting many packages.
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197484 was already fixed
but https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197780 is still open

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/Y5VPNAVHSXNTUP2T6XXK7MZGJO24JONF/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-02/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14352 (-19)
build-tried: 14340 (-14)
build-failed: 23 (-5)
build-n-a: 171 (-2)
build-succeeded: 14146 (-7)
build-official-failed+na: 81 (-10)
build-compare-failed: 495 (+87)
build-compare-succeeded: 13651 (-94)
verify-failed: 439 (-14)
verified-semi-reproducible: 13184 (-80)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13395 (-249)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 760 (+240)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 751 (+242)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
56 were in ring1

That makes it 59/3339 => 1.77 %
which is below the overall average of
495/14146 => 3.50 %

760/14146 => 5.37 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible